LEGAL UPDATE:

Attorney Janis Malec recently won an appellate argument in favor of her client in a case of first impression in Connecticut. She was assisted on the brief by Attorney Mary Ryan. Below is a summary of the case, Kateri Streifel v. William R. Bulkley, 195 Conn. App. 294 (2020).

Summary of the Facts

The plaintiff was a Registered Nurse working in a hospital and the defendant was a patient at that facility. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant claiming that the defendant caused her injuries when he attempted to sit up from a supine position on an examining table, lost his balance, grabbed onto her, and held onto her as he fell back onto the examining table. The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant was “engaging in horseplay while on the examining table.”

Procedural Background

On or about February 25, 2016, the plaintiff filed a Complaint against the defendant. The Complaint contained one negligence count. Defendant filed his Answer and Special Defenses on October 4, 2016 denying the allegations of negligence and raising the defense that he owed no duty of care to a paid caregiver because he was a patient in her care at the time of the alleged incident. Subsequently, on November 9, 2016, the defendant moved for summary judgment because the plaintiff failed to state a valid cause of action. The defendant filed a Memorandum of Law in support of his motion, setting forth the basis for his position that “Plaintiff did not have a viable cause of action because allowing a health care provider to recover against her patient is contrary to public policy, as established by applying the four-part test in Murillo v. Seymour Ambulance Assn., Inc., 264 Conn. 474 (2003).”

On December 19, 2016, the plaintiff filed an Objection to Summary Judgment. No depositions had been taken and only standard discovery had been conducted. Neither party filed supporting affidavits. Following oral argument, the court granted the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment by way of a Memorandum of Decision dated December 28, 2017.

On January 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed an appeal. Defendant’s reply was filed on March 14, 2019. The case was argued on September 17, 2019. On January 14, 2020, the Appellate Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Kateri Streifel v. William R. Bulkley, 195 Conn. App. 294 (2020).

 On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff/Appellant filed for Petition to the Connecticut Supreme Court. Defendant/Appellee filed his opposition on March 18, 2020. On March 25, 2020, the petition for certification was denied.

Summary of the Issues

Plaintiff/Appellant claimed that “the trial court improperly rendered summary judgment because (1) the court should have decided the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as a motion to strike so as to afford her the opportunity to replead a legally sufficient cause of action, (2) determining whether a duty existed involves a question of fact for the jury to decide, (3) the trial court’s application of the Murillo test to this case improperly invoked the abolished doctrine of assumption of the risk because of its analysis of the plaintiff’s status as a nurse and (4)assuming that the determination whether a duty exists is a question of fact for the court to decide, the court incorrectly determined that imposing a duty of care on the defendant while the plaintiff was furnishing medical care to him was inconsistent with public policy.” Kateri Streifel v. William R. Bulkley, 195 Conn. App. 294 (2020).

Holdings

The Appellate Court rejected the plaintiff’s arguments, holding:

  1. The plaintiff waived any claim that the trial court improperly failed to treat the motion for summary judgment as a motion to strike because she failed to object to the trial court deciding the matter through summary judgment and, in the alternative, the plaintiff failed to offer to amend her complaint should the court determine the allegations were legally insufficient.
  2. Determination of whether a duty of care existed under the circumstances of this case was a question of law that the court was permitted to decide through summary proceedings. Furthermore, the Appellate Court held that the question of law that no duty existed could be decided solely on public policy grounds.
  3. Applying the test set forth in Murillo v Seymour Ambulance Assn, Inc. was not inconsistent with the abolition of the doctrine of assumption of the risk by plaintiff as a nurse, to deny her a recovery, because in cases involving medical treatment the Connecticut Supreme Court continues to consider the normal expectation of the participants in the activity, including their statuses.
  4. The Appellate Court declined, as a matter of law, to recognize there is a duty owed by a patient to avoid negligent conduct that causes harm to a medical provider while the patient is receiving medical care from that provider, thus it found the trial court did not act inconsistently with public policy.

In applying the public policy considerations set forth in Murillo, the Appellate Court found they weighed against recognizing a duty owed by the defendant. Specifically, (a) the normal expectations of registered nurses and patients under the circumstances; and (b) balancing the “unlikely enhancement” patient and provider safety by recognizing such a duty against potentially higher medical care costs for patients caused by increased litigation, potentially jeopardizing patient medical confidentiality, the provider’s access to workers’ compensation as a remedy, and the lack of any other jurisdiction recognizing such a duty, considered together all weighed against recognizing such a duty. Furthermore, the Court stated its decision was based on its conclusion that the goals of providing uninhibited access to medical care, encouraging patients to share sensitive information without fear of loss of confidentiality, and the safety of both providers and patients are all important to the integrity of the Connecticut health care system.

The Court took pains to point out that in determining the defendant patient owed no duty of care to the plaintiff nurse, the opinion does not apply to acts by a patient that are intentional or reckless, wanton or malicious. In reaching its decision, the Court was not opining on injuries that may occur outside the context of receiving medical treatment. “Indeed, paramount to our decision that the defendant did not owe the plaintiff a duty of care to avoid negligence in the present case is that the plaintiff sustained her injuries while she was providing medical care to her patient, the defendant.”

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

Privacy Policy

This privacy policy applies to information collected online from users of this website. In this policy, you can learn what kind of information we collect, when and how we might use that information, how we protect the information, and the choices you have with respect to your personal information.

What personal information is collected through this website and how is it used?

We collect information about our users in three ways: directly from the user, from our Web server logs and through cookies. We use the information primarily to provide you with a personalized Internet experience that delivers the information, resources, and services that are most relevant and helpful to you. We don’t share any of the information you provide with others, unless we say so in this Privacy Policy, or when we believe in good faith that the law requires it.

User-supplied information: If you fill out the “contact” form on this website, we will ask you to provide some personal information (such as e-mail address, name, phone number and state). We only require that you provide an e-mail address on the contact form. Further, if chat is available through this site, you may be asked to provide information if you participate in an online chat. Please do not submit any confidential, proprietary or sensitive personally identifiable information (e.g. Social Security Number; date of birth; drivers license number; or credit card, bank account or other financial information) (collectively, “Sensitive Information”). If you submit any Sensitive Information, you do so at your own risk and we will not be liable to you or responsible for consequences of your submission.

Information that you provide to us through the contact form or an online chat will be used so that we may respond to your inquiry. We may also use information you provide to us to communicate with you in the future. If you do not wish to receive such communications, you may opt out (unsubscribe) as described below.

Web server logs: When you visit our website, we may track information about your visit and store that information in web server logs, which are records of the activities on our sites. The servers automatically capture and save the information electronically. Examples of the information we may collect include:

The information we collect in web server logs helps us administer the site, analyze its usage, protect the website and its content from inappropriate use and improve the user’s experience.

Cookies: In order to offer and provide a customized and personal service, our websites and applications may use cookies and similar technologies to store and help track information about you. Cookies are simply small pieces of data that are sent to your browser from a Web server and stored on your computer’s hard drive. We use cookies to help remind us who you are and to help you navigate our sites during your visits. Cookies also can tell us where visitors go on a website and allow us to save preferences for you so you won’t have to re-enter them each time you visit. The use of cookies is relatively standard. Most Internet browsers are initially set up to accept cookies, but you can use your browser to either notify you when you receive a cookie or to disable cookies.

If you wish to disable cookies from this site, you can do so using your browser. You should understand that some features of many sites may not function properly if you don’t accept cookies. For more information about using browsers to manage cookies, please see All About Cookies. You can also refuse to accept Flash cookies from this website using Adobe’s Flash management tools. You can opt out of Google’s use of cookies by visiting Google’s Ad Settings.

By visiting this website, you consent to the use of cookies and similar technologies in accordance with this Privacy Statement.

Third-party Services: We may use services hosted by third parties, including Adobe Site Catalyst, to assist in providing our services and to help us understand the use of our site by our visitors. These services may collect information sent by your browser as part of a web page request, including your IP address or cookies. If these third-party services collect information, they do so anonymously and in the aggregate to provide information helpful to us such as website trends, without identifying individual visitors.

In addition, we may use services provided by third parties to display relevant content, products, services and advertising to you. These third parties may use cookies, web beacons and similar technologies to collect or receive information from this website and elsewhere on the internet. They may then use that information to provide measurement services so we can understand your interests and retarget advertisements based on your previous visits to this website. Please keep in mind that we do not share your personal information with any third-party advertiser, ad server or ad network.

You may be able to opt-out of the collection and use of information for ad targeting by some third parties by visiting www.aboutads.info/choices. You can opt out of Google’s use of cookies by visiting Google’s Ad Settings. You can visit this page to opt out of AdRoll’s and their partners’ targeted advertising. Please see “Cookies” in the section above for more information on how you can control the use of cookies on your computer.

California Do Not Track: Our web services do not alter, change, or respond upon receiving Do Not Track (DNT) requests or signals in browsers. As described in more detail above, we track user activity using web server logs, cookies and similar technologies. Information collected in web server logs helps us analyze website usage and improve the user’s experience. Cookies allow us to offer you a customized experience and present relevant advertising to you.

How is personal information protected?

We take certain appropriate security measures to help protect your personal information from accidental loss and from unauthorized access, use or disclosure. However, we cannot guarantee that unauthorized persons will always be unable to defeat our security measures.

Who has access to the information?

We will not sell, rent, or lease mailing lists or other user data to others, and we will not make your personal information available to any unaffiliated parties, except as follows:

How can I correct, amend or delete my personal information and/or opt out of future communications?

You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. Contact us via the phone number, contact form or mailing address on our website at any time to:

If you have any additional questions or concerns about this privacy policy, please contact us via the phone number, contact form or mailing address listed on this website. If our information practices change in a significant way, we will post the policy changes here.

Effective September 14, 2015

rocky hill Office

GOOGLE MAP »
Directions for 1344 Silas deane highway, Suite 501, rocky hill, ct office

From the North

Take Route 91 South to Exit 24 (Route 99). At the light at the end of the ramp turn left. At the first light turn right as if entering Wendy’s Restaurant, continue straight to The Meadows office building and parking area. We are on the 5th floor, Suite 501.

From the South

Take Route 91 North to  Exit (Route 99). At the end of the ramp turn right and at the second light turn right  at Wendy’s Restaurant and follow the directions above.

From the West

Take Route 84 East to Route 691 East to Route 91 North and follow the directions for From the South.

From the East